Why is it that deniers keep mentioning Al Gore? Is that as close as they ever got to science? - web roulette
Is there any science to back them up? Maybe:
NASA - http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090421.html
NSF - http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/ ...
NOAA - http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwar ...
MIT - http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2009/roule ...
UCLA - http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/glo ...
http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/clim ... \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ U0026lt; == Therefore, a CO2 problem.
http://www.rkm.com.au/ANIMATIONS/carbon- ... \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ U0026lt; == this is physics.
http://www.school-for-champions.com/scie ... \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ U0026lt; == melting Siberian tundra is a time bomb for global warming.
... http://fora.tv/2009/08/18/A_REALLY_Incon \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ U0026lt; == This is a long time, but very good.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/fu ...
Come on, there must be something. Where is it?
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Web Roulette Why Is It That Deniers Keep Mentioning Al Gore? Is That As Close As They Ever Got To Science?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
It is one of the best arguments ... not very sad, right?
Is this one of their best arguments reflects the weakness of his position actually is.
They are only victims of the same thing they accuse him of falling for the faithful.
Propaganda.
Because the science of global warming in bed with politicians. Global warming is a political movement that claims to be science.
(In the past 100 years, but the data show that global average temperature on earth increased by almost one degree Celsius.
An increase of 7.9 ° C in winter, the temperatures in the West
The Antarctic Peninsula over the past 50 years
(NASA - http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090421.html
))
"Almost a degree in" 100 years ", it is the Great Global Warming data that shows the world is over? Increase of nearly one is" the degree of global temperature, we must adapt the CAP and commercial, corporate tax on CO2 emissions and a new world of suppression of environmental exposure?
The same source also says: "An increase of 7.9 ° C in winter, the temperatures in the West
The Antarctic Peninsula over the past 50 years.
Thus, data is correctly about global warming? "Almost a degree" to "100 years" or "7 -9 th middle of winter,... Temperatures in the last 50 years?
or is it both? Or is it still proves that global warming is a real pleasure?
There is global warming, just not as big of a scientific problem of the environment are underway. But listen to Al Gore making wild claims all the melting ice in the Arctic in 5 years only makes the whole movement of global warming as a political farce.
You left a link that I think should be included so that people can move to get to know better.
There are plenty of ammunition to the deniers can be used, they jab at Gore, Hansen, etc., approach to science, tend to seek the facts and chose to fit his arguments. Reputation in this area is strong and respected, and growing. No problems there, so that all references to Gore, to expose "the ignorant they are.
Naughty boy, you get to do! There are many skeptics related material in this prestigious forum.
Mr. Gore is not the community of global anthropogenic climate is significant and spokesperson for the organization? Undoubtedly, it remains a legitimate target. There are more than the science AGW.
His own words is the reason! Listen to his words, if the amount of emissions of CO2 and temperature on the Earth and a planet that is 5-times closer to the sun. His words not mine, stupid and all.
http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/clim ... \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ U0026lt; == Therefore, a CO2 problem. Do you know the amount of CO2 in the air? If you are in a stadium with 10,000 people than air. Only 4 of 10,000 would be from CO2
Eric is not, sure how old you are, but in science was 70, when we lost 10% of the polar cap. New York would be under three feet of water. We are told by science today. This is because GW lost 30 to 40% of the eyelids. If that were true, then New York must have at least 20 + feet of water.
The last time I did not see. In fact, it is not even built up by cells. The temperature of the world has never been static. Take a little time to investigate. You can find what is much colder and many times before man that ever lived.
Eric's 2 Reply to: I am a trained and opinionsto swim here as well as the weak play of the mind. Every time you) your mouth (keyboard to prove it.
Maybe you should see something new and speaks to everyone as it is cold ...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/844902 ...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0, 2933.5825 ...
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/art ...
... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/01/0 ...
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress ...
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_141454 ...
http://www.decaturdaily.com/detail/51045 ...
http://www.kcautv.com/Global/story.asp?S ...
Want more science? Here's something for you ... the earth goes through cycles of warming and cooling!
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/virtualmuseum ...
There are only 15,000 years ago average temperatures were at -200 degrees. You want the lap of the fraud of global warming is so great?
Ah .... Science says the science, said that his eyes do not work in bringing Automoblie day, he at 60 km / h, ISC could break the sound barrier in science, science says that a nuclear explosion could trigger a chain reaction Thet destroy the Earth. Just because science says something ... not be true.
Al Gore tries to bridge the gap between the global warming hoax global science and law bridge gullible who believe that those responsible for this nonsense.
Al Gore is also the unsuspecting public who believe in global warming hearing.
Post a Comment